ESCRS - Laser or ultrasound in cataract surgery? ;
ESCRS - Laser or ultrasound in cataract surgery? ;

Laser or ultrasound in cataract surgery?

Laser or ultrasound in cataract surgery?
Roibeard O’hEineachain
Roibeard O’hEineachain
Published: Monday, December 5, 2016
1185579_63423610   Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) provides better visual outcomes with less trauma to the eye compared to conventional cataract surgery, according to a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies presented at the XXXIV Congress of the ESCRS in Copenhagen, Denmark. The analysis showed that FLACS performed significantly better than conventional surgery in terms of uncorrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell loss and effective phaco time (EPT), and that it posed no additional dangers to the eye apart from a slightly but significantly higher incidence of anterior capsule rupture, reported Thomas Kohnen MD, PhD, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. “FLACS has a comparable advantage and disadvantage profile to conventional cataract surgery. However, FLACS appears to be superior overall,” he added. Prof Kohnen and his associates included in their meta-analysis 38 peer-reviewed prospective and retrospective studies published from April 2015 to March 2016. The studies were identified through a systematic review of MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and Embase. In total, the studies included 8,198 eyes that underwent FLACS and 7,684 eyes that underwent conventional cataract surgery with ultrasound phacoemulsification and manual incisions and capsulotomies. All of the studies compared the two cataract surgery approaches, each recording their own sets of parameters. The researchers found that mean uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in FLACS-treated eyes than in conventionally treated eyes, both overall and in five of seven studies involving a total of 2,215 eyes (p<0.01). Best corrected visual acuity was also better during the first week (p=0.001), but not after the first month. Furthermore, in most of the trials, mean EPT was several times lower in the FLACS groups. That is, in 11 trials involving a total of 609 eyes, mean EPT ranged from 0 seconds to 5.6 seconds among FLACS-treated eyes, and from 0.12 seconds to 14.24 among conventionally treated eyes. LOWER CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS Endothelial cell loss after six months was significantly lower in the FLACS-treated patients, both overall and in five of seven trials, which together involved a total of 833 eyes. The FLACS-treated eyes also had significantly lower central corneal thickness one day and one month after surgery compared to conventionally treated eyes. FLACS also did not appear to endanger the posterior segment to any greater extent than conventional cataract surgery. For example, posterior capsule rupture occurred with similar frequency with the two treatments, as was the case with macular oedema and increased intraocular pressure within the first 24 hours of surgery. Thomas Kohnen: kohnen@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Latest Articles
From Lab to Life: Corneal Repair Goes Cellular

Long-awaited cellular therapies for corneal endothelial disease enter the clinic.

Read more...

Balancing Innovation and Safety

Ensuring access to advanced cell therapies amid regulatory overhaul.

Read more...

With Eyes on Its Future, ESCRS Celebrates Its Past

Winter Meeting offers opportunities to experiment with new concepts and formats.

Read more...

Best of ESCRS Winter Meeting 2024

Read more...

Following the New Generation

EDOF IOLs an option for eyes with mild comorbidities, showing potential in mini-monovision strategies.

Read more...

Refocus on Multifocals

Trifocal IOLs continue to improve as consensus grows regarding indications and contraindications.

Read more...

Common Myths in Presbyopia Correction

Patient education key to satisfaction with refractive IOLs.

Read more...

Reversible Multifocality

Two-lens combination offers low-risk spectacle independence for cataract patients and presbyopes.

Read more...

Managing a Cataract Surgery Refractive Miss

Weighing the pros and cons of options for intraocular intervention.

Read more...

Unleashing OCT’s Full Potential

Performance of newest tool for corneal evaluation meets or beats older standard technologies.

Read more...

;