Posterior polar cataracts
Everything you ever wanted to know about posterior polar cataracts
TBC Soosan Jacob
Published: Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Proper preoperative identification is therefore important to avoid posterior capsular rent and vitreous loss.WHY, HOW, WHICH? The capsulorhexis should be centred and sized to be suitable for optic capture in the eventuality of a sulcus placement of the intraocular lens (IOL). All surgical manoeuvres should be aimed at negating any stress or pressure on the weakened posterior capsule. Hydrodissection should never be performed for posterior polar cataracts as it can cause a hydraulic perforation of the posterior capsule or enlargement of a pre-existing defect, generally at the border of the cataract. I prefer instead to perform a gentle multi-quadrant, limited viscodissection by injecting small aliquots of viscoelastic under the anterior capsule in multiple sites limited to a few millimetres beyond the rhexis and not crossing the equator. This has the benefit of initiating a limited anterior cortical cleavage, while also acting as a barrier preventing accidental hydrodissection. A controlled hydrodelineation is then done to separate the epinucleus and the central nucleus. The hydro cannula is inserted into the nucleus in a plane away from the height of the polar cataract so that the fluid wave from hydrodelineation does not rupture the posterior capsule. An inside-out hydrodelineation, as described by Vasavada et al, may also be performed after gently sculpting an initial groove in the nucleus followed by injection of fluid at the desired depth in the groove. A good hydrodelineation allows the generally small and soft nucleus to be lollipopped or speared out gently with the phaco probe. Iris plane or anterior chamber phacoemulsification can then be safely performed. The epinuclear shell gives additional protection during nucleus removal. Slow-motion phacoemulsification with low power, flow rate, vaccum and infusion creates a highly stable intraocular environment. Another technique that has been described for removing soft nuclei is by first performing hydro-free dissection using a blunt spatula that is passed up to the equatorial fornix to free cortico-capsular adhesions. The nucleus is then progressively debulked in the inferior half. The remaining superior nucleus is then brought to the centre with a combination of visco-displacement and manual manoeuvring and is then removed. Though a gentle chop may be attempted for denser nuclei, care should be taken not to apply any posterior pressure. Femtodelineation using a cylindrical pattern of laser application, as described by Vasavada et al, creates multiple concentric layers that act as shock absorbers and prevent stress transmission to the posterior capsule during surgery. However, care still needs to be taken that the intra-lenticular gas bubbles created by the femtosecond laser do not increase intra-lenticular pressure and cause a posterior capsular rent. A capsular block syndrome may also similarly occur causing a rent. CORTEX REMOVAL AND CHAMBER FLUCTUATIONS Chamber fluctuations can cause a dehiscence at the edge of the posterior polar cataract and this should be avoided at all times. Viscoelastic should be injected through the side port before removing the phaco or I/A probe to prevent forward movement of the lens-iris diaphragm. This is especially important at the time of cortex aspiration, as the chamber can shallow, and with most of the lenticular material removed, the bag can move forwards substantially while removing the I/A probe, resulting in a posterior capsular dehiscence. Cortex aspiration should be done gently and by stripping the cortex carefully, and slowly by engaging it from under the rhexis. It is helpful to partially strip and loosen the cortex from all sides before finally removing the posterior polar element, though often the plaque comes loose and can then be aspirated. Any residual posterior capsular opacity is best left for subsequent YAG capsulotomy. At no point should the cortex be attempted to be directly aspirated from the posterior capsule, even with capsule polishing mode, as this can cause a tear in the weakened capsule. The IOL is finally implanted into the bag, avoiding direct contact of the leading edge of the IOL on the weakened posterior capsule and taking care that it slides gently into the distal fornix. An IOL that gently unfolds in the bag is preferred. CAPSULAR TEAR If a capsular tear does occur, a closed system should be maintained before retracting the phaco or I/A probe by injecting viscoelastic to avoid vitreous prolapse. Vitrectomy should be performed and the IOL placed into the ciliary sulcus with optic capture. Dr Soosan Jacob is Director and Chief of Dr Agarwal’s Refractive and Cornea Foundation at Dr Agarwal’s Eye Hospital, Chennai, India dr_soosanj@hotmail.com
Latest Articles
From Lab to Life: Corneal Repair Goes Cellular
Long-awaited cellular therapies for corneal endothelial disease enter the clinic.
Balancing Innovation and Safety
Ensuring access to advanced cell therapies amid regulatory overhaul.
With Eyes on Its Future, ESCRS Celebrates Its Past
Winter Meeting offers opportunities to experiment with new concepts and formats.
Best of ESCRS Winter Meeting 2024
Following the New Generation
EDOF IOLs an option for eyes with mild comorbidities, showing potential in mini-monovision strategies.
Refocus on Multifocals
Trifocal IOLs continue to improve as consensus grows regarding indications and contraindications.
Common Myths in Presbyopia Correction
Patient education key to satisfaction with refractive IOLs.
Reversible Multifocality
Two-lens combination offers low-risk spectacle independence for cataract patients and presbyopes.
Managing a Cataract Surgery Refractive Miss
Weighing the pros and cons of options for intraocular intervention.
Unleashing OCT’s Full Potential
Performance of newest tool for corneal evaluation meets or beats older standard technologies.