A world of experience in retinal image quality
Good visual acuity does not always reflect a good visual image
Leigh Spielberg
Published: Saturday, February 11, 2017
There are six noticeable differences in retinal image quality in just one line of visual acuityHe stressed that visual acuity is in fact a poor performance metric. “It is therefore not surprising that cross-sectional studies correlating measures of retinal image quality and visual performance have been only moderately impressive,” he pointed out. So what connects the two? “The visual Strehl and neural strength tests are excellent metrics of visual image quality that are highly correlated with visual performance as measured by acuity,” explained Dr Applegate, suggesting that clinical investigators focus on these metrics.
Latest Articles
From Lab to Life: Corneal Repair Goes Cellular
Long-awaited cellular therapies for corneal endothelial disease enter the clinic.
Balancing Innovation and Safety
Ensuring access to advanced cell therapies amid regulatory overhaul.
With Eyes on Its Future, ESCRS Celebrates Its Past
Winter Meeting offers opportunities to experiment with new concepts and formats.
Best of ESCRS Winter Meeting 2024
Following the New Generation
EDOF IOLs an option for eyes with mild comorbidities, showing potential in mini-monovision strategies.
Refocus on Multifocals
Trifocal IOLs continue to improve as consensus grows regarding indications and contraindications.
Common Myths in Presbyopia Correction
Patient education key to satisfaction with refractive IOLs.
Reversible Multifocality
Two-lens combination offers low-risk spectacle independence for cataract patients and presbyopes.
Managing a Cataract Surgery Refractive Miss
Weighing the pros and cons of options for intraocular intervention.
Unleashing OCT’s Full Potential
Performance of newest tool for corneal evaluation meets or beats older standard technologies.